USDC to USDT Swap Exploited with a $215k Loss, How Does MEV Attack Stablecoin Trades?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/13 12:15:02
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Crypto trader gets sandwich attacked in stablecoin swap, loses $215K
Original Article Author: Brayden Lindrea, Cointelegraph Author
Original Article Translation: ChatGPT

Editor's Note: This article covers a sandwich attack incident that occurred in a cryptocurrency trade, where a trader lost over $215,000 during a stablecoin exchange. The article provides a detailed account of the attack, including how MEV bots profited through frontrunning and discusses potential money laundering activities. Additionally, it mentions the protective measures taken by the Uniswap platform to prevent such attacks and clarifies initial criticisms.

Below is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):

On March 12, a crypto trader fell victim to a sandwich attack while transferring $220,764 in stablecoins, losing nearly 98% of its value, amounting to $215,000, which was captured by a MEV bot.

A $220,764 USDC stablecoin value was swapped to $5,271 Tether USDT within 8 seconds, as the MEV bot successfully front-ran the transaction, profiting over $215,500 from it.

Data from the Ethereum block explorer shows that this MEV attack occurred in the USDC-USDT liquidity pool of the decentralized exchange Uniswap v3, with assets worth $19.8 million locked in the pool.

USDC to USDT Swap Exploited with a 15k Loss, How Does MEV Attack Stablecoin Trades?

Details of the Sandwich Attack Transaction Source: Etherscan

According to Michael Nadeau, the founder of The DeFi Report, the MEV bot front-ran by swapping out all USDC liquidity from Uniswap v3's USDC-USDT pool and then putting it back after the transaction execution.

Nadeau stated that the attacker paid a $200,000 fee to the Ethereum block builder "bob-the-builder.eth" from the $220,764 transaction and pocketed $8,000 for themselves.

DeFi researcher "DeFiac" speculated that the same trader using different wallets may have experienced a total of six sandwich attacks, citing "internal tools" as evidence. They noted that all funds were sourced from the Aave lending protocol before being deposited into Uniswap.

Two wallets fell victim to MEV sandwich attacks around 9 a.m. UTC on March 12th. Ethereum wallet addresses "0xDDe…42a6D" and "0x999…1D215" were sandwich attacked in transactions that occurred three to four minutes apart, resulting in losses of $138,838 and $128,003, respectively.

These two traders conducted trades in the Uniswap v3 liquidity pool similar to a trader exchanging $220,762.

Speculation arose that these transactions might be related to money laundering.

0xngmi, the founder of the crypto data dashboard DefiLlama, stated, "If you have NK illicit funds, you can construct a transaction that is very easily exploited by MEV and privately send it to an MEV bot, allowing them to arbitrage in a bundle. This way, you can wash all the money with close to zero loss."

While Nadeau initially criticized Uniswap, he later acknowledged that these transactions did not originate from Uniswap's frontend, which has MEV protection and default slippage settings.

After Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams and others clarified the protective measures taken by Uniswap to prevent sandwich attacks, Nadeau retracted those criticisms.

"Original Article Link"

-- Price

--

You may also like

Curve Deploys Llamalend v2 on Optimism With 250,000 OP Incentives

Curve launched Llamalend v2 on Optimism with 250,000 OP incentives from the Optimism Foundation. The upgrade expands Llamalend beyond its earlier crvUSD-focused model, adding broader collateral support, LlamaRisk market reviews, and the ability to use Curve LP tokens as collateral.

Raydium Old Liquidity Pool Reportedly Exploited, With $1.34 Million Moved to Ethereum and Tornado Cash

An old Raydium liquidity pool was reportedly exploited for around $1.34 million in USDC, RAY, and wSOL, with the stolen funds bridged to Ethereum and deposited into Tornado Cash. The incident highlights the tail risks of legacy DeFi pools, old contracts, and cross-chain fund laundering paths.

Kalshi Executive Challenges “SBF Backed AI Unicorns” Narrative, Says Leopold Aschenbrenner Was Key Figure

Kalshi executive John Wang questioned the “SBF backed AI unicorns” narrative, saying Leopold Aschenbrenner was the key figure behind major AI investment decisions.

Pantera Capital Partner: How Tokenization is Restructuring the Private Equity and Early Investment Ecosystem?

Top tech companies are going public later and later, leaving retail investors shut out during the high growth period. Can tokenization give ordinary people back this entry ticket?

New York Proposes Stricter Stablecoin Issuer Rules Aligned With Federal GENIUS Act

NYDFS proposed stricter stablecoin issuer rules aligned with the GENIUS Act, covering reserves, custody, redemption timelines, audits, and capital buffers.

Every exchange is a "Universal Exchange."

You initially build infrastructure for something, then realize it can also be used for many other things, and then you continuously expand the business to accommodate everything that the infrastructure can support.

Contents

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com